<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cloudymind &#187; Professional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cloudymind.com/tags/professional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cloudymind.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 19:51:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>An Elph is my new Leica bicycle</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudymind.com/2008/05/25/an-elph-is-my-new-leica-bicycle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudymind.com/2008/05/25/an-elph-is-my-new-leica-bicycle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 18:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadget thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudymind.com/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
I was a photojournalism student at the University of Missouri in the early &#8217;90s when I discovered the Leica M. In contrast to the massive steel Canon and Nikon bricks we all used at the time, Leicas were small, elegant and unimposing.
 Image from a fantastic New Yorker article on the Leica mystique 
Despite my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/_mg_0057.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-219" title="_mg_0057" src="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/_mg_0057.jpg" alt="" width="450" height="299" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I was a photojournalism student at the University of Missouri in the early &#8217;90s when I discovered the Leica M. In contrast to the massive steel Canon and Nikon <a href="http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/nikonf3ver2/variations/f3hspeed/images/F3HMD4e85mmf14d.JPG" target="_blank">bricks</a> we all used at the time, <a href="http://www.magnumphotos.com/LowRes2/TR3/S/K/B/W/PAR148921.jpg" target="_blank">Leicas</a> were small, elegant and unimposing.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/09/24/070924fa_fact_lane?printable=true" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.newyorker.com/images/2007/09/24/p233/070924_r16606_p233.jpg" alt="" width="233" height="332" /><em> Image from a fantastic New Yorker article on the Leica mystique </em></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Despite my lavish $4,000 annual income, I vowed to acquire one. Luck would smile upon me (in the guise of a friend&#8217;s crazy photographer boyfriend) and I soon had not one, but a pair of well-used <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leica_M2" target="_blank">M2s</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">My big Nikons (and later Canons) were the workhorses, with their choice of wide-angle and telephoto lenses, motor drives and fancy light-meters. Framing in an SLR was precise, showing you exactly where your focus was and what you would be capturing on film.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">But I always had one of those little Leicas tucked away under my arm, loaded with forgiving Tri-X black-and-white film. In the large, bright viewfinder, everything appeared in sharp focus with transparent lines to show you *about* where the edges of your frame were. Focus was fast, but not precise- that&#8217;s why God made <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field" target="_blank">Depth of Field</a>. There was no built-in light meter. Most of the time I&#8217;d set exposure by experience and let the film&#8217;s latitude take care of the details.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The Leicas were all about shooting fast and loose, ideal for catching quick, unguarded moments at unexpected times; the perfect tool for making pictures when you weren&#8217;t Making Pictures.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Fast forward about 10 years. Digital had finally stopped sucking and I bought a pair of Canon EOS 10d SLRs. Instantly in love with the ease of digital, my old Leicas were immediately relegated to the closet. I&#8217;ve been an digital SLR user for years now, but I&#8217;ve continued to long for that fast and loose, go-anywhere camera in digital form.<span id="more-218"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">My first experiment with digital point-and-shoots (an Olympus C-5050) left me insanely frustrated. Yes, it captured beautiful images- sharp, plenty of resolution, great tonal scale. But it lacked what I consider 2 fairly critical features- the first being the ability to see what the hell your taking a picture of. The Olympus had a joke of an optical viewfinder (more of a small tunnel for aiming) and the now-standard answer of the LCD on the back of the camera. That&#8217;s great if you want to make sure you&#8217;re not cutting grandma&#8217;s head off, but even the largest P&amp;S LCD lacks the fine detail and resolution needed to really see what your subjects are doing and what else is going on in the frame.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img src="http://di1.shopping.com/images/di/50/51/49/42636d744c4147375333664d3748797a734c77-100x100-0-0.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="99" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">In an attempt to solve this problem, I found this Voigtlander hot-shoe mounted 35mm viewfinder. Like the Leica&#8217;s, the image was large, bright and detailed. The frame lines weren&#8217;t exactly precise, but close enough. Mounted in the Olympus&#8217; hot-shoe, I thought I was finally getting somewhere. Unfortunately, I was never able to work around a second critical problem.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The single most important feature of the fast, candid camera is taking the damn picture when you press the button.  Not <em>kinda-approximately-when-you-press-the-button-after-I-check-the-exposure,-focus,-wind,-cycle-of-the-moon,-call-your-mom-</em><strong>now</strong>, but <strong>NOW</strong>. The Olympus, likely in some madningly-Japanese attempt to upsell <em>real </em>cameras, would SOMETIMES take the picture when you pressed the button. No matter how well you set prefocus and exposure or disabled the nanny features, sometimes the camera would just think for a second or two.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The Olympus eventually ended up as a Christmas gift to my far more patient father, and I went back to my Canons.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.digitalreview.ca/Canon-Powershot/Canon-SD750-SD1000-Digital-Camera.shtml" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.digitalreview.ca/cams/pics/Canon_SD1000_frontside.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="250" /><em>image from DPReview</em></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Last year, on the spur of the moment I decided I wanted a small camera to keep in<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tumbleweed/1253739588/" target="_blank"> my bag</a>. I wasn&#8217;t looking for a Leica replacement, but simply something that was a) very small and b) had better resolution than my phone. After playing with about a dozen cameras, I decided on the little <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&amp;fcategoryid=145&amp;modelid=14901" target="_blank">Canon Powershot SD1000</a>. It was tiny, well-built and (to my shock) quite fast. It starts up almost instantly and as long as I pre-focus, the shutter lag is almost non-existent. Image quality seemed perfectly acceptable- a little noisy, contrasty and over-sharpened, but usable for the kinds of visual note-taking I intended. Alas, it too had only a tube-like optical viewfinder and no hot-shoe, so I was back to LCD framing.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Or maybe not.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/_mg_0059.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-220" title="_mg_0059" src="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/_mg_0059.jpg" alt="" width="448" height="298" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I decided to bend out a bit of sheet-metal into a crude hot-shoe and super-glued it to the top of the camera. As with my Olympus experiment, the framelines aren&#8217;t exact but are surprisingly close.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/_mg_0068.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-223" title="_mg_0068" src="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/_mg_0068-300x296.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="296" /><br />
</a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I played around with the positioning of the finder on the top of the camera and eventually settled on a position slightly offset from the center of the lens. Why? So my nose could comfortably lay aside the camera.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;">Finally, instead of framing a shot like this:<a href="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/_mg_0062.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-222" title="_mg_0062" src="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/_mg_0062.jpg" alt="" width="446" height="297" /></a><br />
I can frame a shot seeing this:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/_mg_0060.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-221" title="_mg_0060" src="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/_mg_0060.jpg" alt="" width="446" height="297" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I replaced the hand strap with a loop of bungee cord. I can carry the camera tucked discretely under my arm but still grab it and shoot almost instantly.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/_mg_0076.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-224" title="_mg_0076" src="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/_mg_0076-300x240.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="240" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The last changes I made were to the camera settings themselves. Because I have no focus confirmation in the optical finder, I turned on the &#8220;beepbeep&#8221; focus lock sound and also reactivated the fake shutter sound to get audible confirmation that the camera had in fact followed my orders to take the picture.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Also, to minimize the problems with blown highlights and over-sharpening artifacts, I rooted around and found the &#8220;color effects&#8221; menu where I found custom settings for sharpness, contrast and saturation, all of which I turned way down. It&#8217;s not perfect, but I&#8217;m now able to get very acceptable black-and-white images, like this one.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/img_0453.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-225" title="img_0453" src="http://www.cloudymind.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/img_0453.jpg" alt="" width="459" height="344" /> </a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Is it perfect? No. There are loads of <a href="http://www.gr-digital.com/" target="_blank">new </a>options out there to <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/536005@N22/" target="_blank">replace </a>my old M2s, including an actual <a href="http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/4133/extreme-field-test-leica-m8-in-iraq.html" target="_self">digital Leica M</a> and I may eventually buy into one of them. But for now (and for relatively little money) I&#8217;ve got a happy little solution for fast and light picture making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudymind.com/2008/05/25/an-elph-is-my-new-leica-bicycle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A lazy man&#8217;s successful war on email</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudymind.com/2008/02/21/a-lazy-mans-successful-war-on-email-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudymind.com/2008/02/21/a-lazy-mans-successful-war-on-email-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew.locke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GTD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudymind.com/2008/02/21/a-lazy-mans-successful-war-on-email-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(reposted from my old blog to maintain a copy…)
Like essentially everyone I know, I have struggled under the weight of an overflowing inbox for almost as long as I’ve had an email account (something like 15 years now). Like my smoking habit, I’ve tried countless times to wrestle email into submission using an endless stream [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(reposted from my old blog to maintain a copy…)</p>
<p>Like essentially everyone I know, I have struggled under the weight of an overflowing inbox for almost as long as I’ve had an<b> </b>email<b> </b>account (something like 15 years now). Like my smoking habit, I’ve tried countless times to wrestle email into submission using an endless stream of productivity strategies, tools and gizmos: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">GTD</a>, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/7106.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">‘Take Back Your Life’</a>, <a href="http://www.goodexperience.com/blog/archives/cat_bit_literacy.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Good Experience/Bit Literacy</a>, <a href="http://www.gootodo.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Gootodo</a>,<a href="http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/mice_pointers/digital_pen/&#038;cl=us,en" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Logitech IO pens</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hipster_pda" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Hipster PDAs</a>, <a href="http://www.moleskinerie.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Moleskines</a>, and the good ole “Leaving Emails I Need To Work On as Unread” system. None of them have really stuck, mainly because there have always been key pieces that take more effort than my lazy ass is willing to put into them.</p>
<p>After a lot of thought (I’m intensely diligent when it comes to enabling my own laziness) I’ve come up with a system that works for me. It borrows bits and pieces from most of the things I’ve tried, but far and away the closest to what I do is Merlin Mann’s <a href="http://www.43folders.com/izero/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Inbox Zero</a>. I’ve been using it successfully for about 6 months (including the massive email task of returning from two separate vacations) which is huge for me.</p>
<p><span id="more-188"></span></p>
<p><b>Note on my environment: </b>I live in an Exchange world, so even though I use OS X at home and work, I run Outlook 2007 via <a href="http://www.parallels.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Parallels</a>. <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/entourage2004/entourage2004.aspx?pid=entourage2004" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Entourage </a>is a great product, but I’ve found there are little bits of Exchange integration that I rely on that it doesn’t do. I’m assuming you have the ability to file email to folders and a robust, integrated calendaring solution. There are certain little tricks described here that may or may not work if you’re using Mail.app/iCal, Entourage, Gmail, but you should be able to accomplish everything using any modern mail/cal system.</p>
<p><b><i>(Edit: I’ve now moved almost completely over to Entourage 2008. It works beautifully with our Exchange environment. The only thing I can’t do is book a meeting room… grrr)</i></b></p>
<p>Also, though I use an iPhone, I carry a separate Windows Mobile phone that does nothing but exchange stuff (email, calender, contacts)– an HTC TyTn running WM6<b><i> (update: now carry a Treo 750 WM6 along with the iPhone)</i></b> in case you care. Again, your setup may differ,but I find having a <b>well-integrated</b> mobile client for mail/calender/contacts is critically important for me, as I’ll describe further down.<br />If you’re ready to give it a try, I’d suggest carving out 2 hours of time to set yourself up. Schedule it now on your calender. I’ll wait…</p>
<p><b>Step 1:</b> <a href="http://www.43folders.com/2007/07/25/merlins-inbox-zero-talk/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Watch this</a>. It will take an hour, but Merlin is a really smart and entertaining guy and it will psych you up for what is to follow. (It also provides a small and somewhat terrifying glimpse into Google’s email culture, which is also entertaining and fascinating). I don’t follow everything he suggests but the tenants are the same.</p>
<p><b>Step 2: </b>Create a folder called “zOld mail– YYYY/MM/DD”. Select the entire contents of your inbox, and drag them into that folder. You now have an empty inbox, achieving 90% of your goal.<br />Do not worry about going through it, sorting it, taking action on any of it. If you were going to do that, you would have done it already. You are a lazy asshole. Admitting it is the first step in allowing yourself to be a lazy asshole with an empty inbox. If you really need it (you won’t- we’ve already covered that.. but just to humor you) it’s still there.</p>
<p>You probably have the remnants of an old email filing structure. Drag that in there, too. It didn’t work for you. I know it didn’t because you’re reading this stupid post. You are lazy, remember?<br />(Note: the <b>z</b>Old is kinda funny if you say it out loud “ze Frank, ze old….”, but more importantly it drops that folder to the bottom of your mail folders, getting it out of the way. The date at the end is a preemptive acceptance that you will probably lapse at least once in the future and will want to keep things straight when pull yourself together again.)<br /><b>Step 3:</b> Create a maximum of 2 folders called ‘@ Project- XXXX’.</p>
<ul>
<li>Name the first project folder for the main thing you do. I’m talking seriously broad here. I manage the entire video business for MSNBC.com, leading our efforts in sales, editorial, technology, marketing; the whole lot. 90% of all email I receive relates to video in some form or fashion. I have a project folder called “@ Project- Video”. That’s it– ALL of the email relating to video that I need to save goes in there.</li>
<li>Name the second project folder “@ Project- Other”. This is where you will store everything work-related that didn’t fit into the first folder<i>. If your job is so varied that no one thing stands out, no matter how broad, <b>ONLY MAKE ONE FOLDER.</b><br /></i>
</li>
<li>You may think, “How the hell am I going to find anything if everything I do is filed in one or two folders?” I’ll get into a bit more detail later, but the bottom line is, you just will. You’ll probably remember who sent what you’re looking for, sort by name, and find it quickly. If you don’t, there’s always search. And there will always be search. You do not have to worry about some technologically apocalyptic future wherein you’re required to port all your mail to a VT100 terminal based <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_(e-mail_client)" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Pine </a>system. Gmail (and mail search) will only get better…<i><b><br /></b></i>
</li>
<li>The @ symbol (stolen from GTD) serves a different purpose here than it does there. It simply allows these folders to sort alphabetically to the top of your folder structure, making them easier to access. You’ll be using these fairly frequently.</li>
</ul>
<p><b>Step 4: </b>Create a folder called @ Follow-up. This is the most dangerous thing you will do, but you’re a grown-up and you must learn how to wield this power. This is where you will put all email that you can’t respond to today (for any reason) but need to at some point. Pay close attention later when I describe how to use it.</p>
<p><b>Step 5: </b>Create a folder called @ To Read, then filter like a madman. This is an ongoing process, but the gist is this: any email list, alias, or notification messages that do not directly cause you to do actual work should be filtered into this folder. Think of this like your email RSS feed– it’s there for stuff that you want to/need to read, but you are not required to act or respond. <b><br /></b></p>
<p><b>Step 6:</b> This is optional, but if you have a mix of work and personal mail in one account (as I still do despite best efforts) create a folder called “Personal”. This is where you will file anything you want to refer to later that’s not work related– that link to the Youtube video with the cat shooting a machine gun, the sexy email from your boyfriend that you want to lord over him later, whatever.</p>
<p><b>Laws of the Lazy Inbox:</b></p>
<ol>
<li>Delete ruthlessly- I mean seriously, pathologically Jeffery Dahmer ruthless. No fear, no doubt. You’ve got to learn to enjoy it, like popping bubble wrap or killing a determined mosquito. Email is a time-shifted communication medium. You are (probably) not gathering evidence for a lawsuit. You don’t record all your phone calls, do you? Why are you freaky about email? Don’t be. Let it go. Unless you have the memory of a brain-damaged goldfish, you’ll be able to recall the gist of what people said, want, etc. well enough that you don’t need to save their messages like they were the Chalice of Christ.
<ul>
<li><i>Note: This is where the mobile device comes in for me most of the time. Any moment I have to spare I fire up mobile mail JUST to delete stuff I don’t need to read and/or save. Don’t respond, don’t think about acting, don’t worry– just clear things out for when you’re ready to get actual work done. This is also why an iPhone/Gmail sucks– deleting mail on the phone does NOT delete it from your inbox, defeating the whole point IMHO.</i></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>If you just can’t delete it, can’t or aren’t expected to do anything about, but want to save it for future reference, file it in one of your @ Project folders (or Personal if it fits). The beauty of your filing system is that you could train the above-mentioned, brain-damaged goldfish to file your damn email. No thought. Get it out of there.</li>
<li>If you actually have to do something, you have exactly 4 choices.
<ul>
<li>Respond right now and delete (or file if you must). If will only take a minute or two to do it, this is always the best course of action. Answer the question, pass the buck, ask another question, whatever. Don’t read too much into or overthink the email. If your boss asks you to save the earth from environmental collapse, just try to take that first step in the process: forward the message to Al Gore and <i>get it the hell out of your inbox.<br /></i>
</li>
<li>If you don’t have time to do the thing in the mail right now, grab the email and drag it into your calender. Block out a date and time to accomplish the thing inferred. In Outlook this is really simple– literally drag drag the mail from your inbox over to the calender button in the lower left. <b><i>(update: In Entourage 2008, it’s even easier. Just highlight the message and hit ctrl-e) </i></b>It’ll automatically create an appointment with the same subject and body as the email. Just pick an open time and hit save. Don’t overthink when to schedule yourself, or get all fancy trying to describe your task. Just pick some free time and move on. You’re lazy but you’re not a freakin’ idiot. Be generous with the time– even if you think something will only take 15 minutes schedule yourself for 30. If you don’t need the time, maybe your bladder will.</li>
<li>If your action is required, but you have to wait for someone or something else before you can act, you’ve found the ONLY use of the @ Follow up folder. <i>As an example: Say your boss is asking for that TPS report. You’ve done your part, but you’re waiting on one of your underlings to finish his. Send your underling a reminder (or drag the mail over to your calender to remind yourself to walk over and beat your underling) then put your boss’s email in the @ Followup folder. </i><b>Note: you should look at items in your @ Followup folder like inmates on death row in Texas. If they sit there for more than a few days, you better either schedule yourself to get the thing unstuck, or just freakin delete it and hope you don’t get fired. They will not solve themselves– this is the most vital thing to understand and the most dangerous part of the whole system.</b>
</li>
<li>Last option: delete it anyway.<b> </b>This sounds insane, but you often just know you’re never going to get around to doing whatever is being requested of you. Emails from distant friends and relatives often fall into this category. You want to reply, but how often do you really? You have to be brutally honest with yourself. Either schedule some time to do it properly, or just kill it off. It sounds cold, but do you ever screen your caller ID? Hmmmm…. think about it.<b><br /></b>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
<p><b>Further basking in the abject brilliance of the lazy email system<br /></b></p>
<ol>
<li>You’ll notice that there’s no task list in this system, only a calender. Lazy people should not be allowed to make their own decisions. They need to be told what to do and when to do it, in what order. You’re essentially tricking yourself into telling yourself what and when to do stuff. Neat, huh?</li>
<li>Given the importance of the calender, you must respect it. If you don’t get something done in the time allotted on your calender item, reschedule yourself until its done.</li>
<li>Calendar-dragging-fu works against your enemies even better than against yourself. If you ask someone for something and they give you the brush off (”get back to me next week”), just drag that email into your calender and set a time to get back to them when they said to. They’ll be so freaked out that you remembered that they’ll probably actually give you what you want.</li>
<li>If you’re, say, a consultant who manages 5 different clients at a time, the 1 or 2 folder filing system may sound like utter lunacy, but it’s key to the system and I strongly encourage you to give it a try. The less time you spend worrying about mechanically processing email, the more time you’ll have to be a badass consultant dude. Do more of what they’re really paying you for and let search do the heavy lifting of information retrieval. Let computers do their thing. They’re getting pretty good at it.</li>
<li>Taking notes: Just do it in email, then email them to yourself. At that point, you can process it just like anything else. If you need to clean them up and send them along to your team, just drag to the calender and schedule some time to do that. If you just need them for your own records, put them in your @ Project folder.</li>
<li>‘Ubiquitous Capture’ is all the rage in GTD circles (with their almost fetishistic Hipster PDAs and Moleskines) and for good reason. <i><b>It’s critically important that you capture things for later follow up while you’re on the go.</b></i> This is another great reason for the well-integrated, brick-sized QWERTY email phone. Again, just shoot yourself a quick, subject-only email to remind yourself, then process it when you’re back at your desk. If you have a little more time, go ahead and create a calender item right there on your phone. If you’re a dumb-phone kinda person, I suggest carrying a pad of sticky notes that you file in a personally annoying place (like stuck on the front of your dumb talk-only cell phone) to make sure you don’t forget or lose them.</li>
<li>Advanced lazyness: Now that I’ve gotten more comfortable with the system, I’m ok with leaving an email in my inbox for a few hours at a time, knowing I’m going to get to later in the day. But you can’t make a habit of it, and I strongly suggest not allowing even that for the first month or two.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudymind.com/2008/02/21/a-lazy-mans-successful-war-on-email-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A lazy man&#8217;s successful war on email</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudymind.com/2007/08/31/a-lazy-mans-successful-war-on-email/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudymind.com/2007/08/31/a-lazy-mans-successful-war-on-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GTD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudymind.com/2007/08/31/a-lazy-mans-successful-war-on-email/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(This post has been updated here, but is left in place for those who might have it linked)
Like essentially everyone I know, I have struggled under the weight of an overflowing inbox for almost as long as I&#8217;ve had an email account (something like 15 years now). Like my smoking habit, I&#8217;ve tried countless times [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>(This post has been updated <a href="http://www.cloudymind.com/2008/02/21/a-lazy-mans-successful-war-on-email-2/">here</a>, but is left in place for those who might have it linked)</em></p>
<p>Like essentially everyone I know, I have struggled under the weight of an overflowing inbox for almost as long as I&#8217;ve had an email account (something like 15 years now). Like my smoking habit, I&#8217;ve tried countless times to wrestle email into submission using an endless stream of productivity strategies, tools and gizmos: <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done">GTD</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.microsoft.com/mspress/books/7106.aspx">&#8216;Take Back Your Life&#8217;</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.goodexperience.com/blog/archives/cat_bit_literacy.php">Good Experience/Bit Literacy</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.gootodo.com/">Gootodo</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/mice_pointers/digital_pen/&#038;cl=us,en">Logitech IO pens</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hipster_pda">Hipster PDAs</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.moleskinerie.com/">Moleskines</a>, and the good ole &#8220;Leaving Emails I Need To Work On as Unread&#8221; system. None of them have really stuck, mainly because there have always been key pieces that take more effort than my lazy ass is willing to put into them.</p>
<p>After a lot of thought (I&#8217;m intensely diligent when it comes to enabling my own laziness) I&#8217;ve come up with a system that works for me. It borrows bits and pieces from most of the things I&#8217;ve tried, but far and away the closest to what I do is Merlin Mann&#8217;s <a target="_blank" href="http://www.43folders.com/izero/">Inbox Zero</a>. I&#8217;ve been using it successfully for about 6 months (including the massive email task of returning from two separate vacations) which is huge for me.</p>
<p>Read on, MacDuff&#8230;.</p>
<p><span id="more-52"></span></p>
<p><strong>Note on my environment: </strong>I live in an Exchange world, so even though I use OS X at home and work, I run Outlook 2007 via <a target="_blank" href="http://www.parallels.com/">Parallels</a>. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.microsoft.com/mac/products/entourage2004/entourage2004.aspx?pid=entourage2004">Entourage </a>is a great product, but I&#8217;ve found there are little bits of Exchange integration that I rely on that it doesn&#8217;t do. I&#8217;m assuming you have the ability to file email to folders and a robust, integrated calendaring solution. There are certain little tricks described here that may or may not work if you&#8217;re using Mail.app/iCal, Entourage, Gmail, but you should be able to accomplish everything using any modern mail/cal system.<br />
Also, though I use an iPhone, I carry a separate Windows Mobile phone that does nothing but exchange stuff (email, calender, contacts)&#8211; an HTC TyTn running WM6 in case you care. Again, your setup may differ,but I find having a <strong>well-integrated</strong> mobile client for mail/calender/contacts is critically important for me, as I&#8217;ll describe further down.<br />
If you&#8217;re ready to give it a try, I&#8217;d suggest carving out 2 hours of time to set yourself up. Schedule it now on your calender. I&#8217;ll wait&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Step 1:</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.43folders.com/2007/07/25/merlins-inbox-zero-talk/">Watch this</a>. It will take an hour, but Merlin is a really smart and entertaining guy and it will psych you up for what is to follow. (It also provides a small and somewhat terrifying glimpse into Google&#8217;s email culture, which is also entertaining and fascinating). I don&#8217;t follow everything he suggests but the tenants are the same.</p>
<p><strong>Step 2:  </strong>Create a folder called &#8220;zOld mail&#8211; YYYY/MM/DD&#8221;. Select the entire contents of your inbox, and drag them into that folder. You now have an empty inbox, achieving 90% of your goal.<br />
Do not worry about going through it, sorting it, taking action on any of it. If you were going to do that, you would have done it already. You are a lazy asshole. Admitting it is the first step in allowing yourself to be a lazy asshole with an empty inbox. If you really need it (you won&#8217;t- we&#8217;ve already covered that.. but just to humor you) it&#8217;s still there.</p>
<p>You probably have the remnants of an old email filing structure. Drag that in there, too. It didn&#8217;t work for you.  I know it didn&#8217;t because you&#8217;re reading this stupid post. You are lazy, remember?<br />
(Note: the <strong>z</strong>Old is kinda funny if you say it out loud &#8220;ze Frank, ze old&#8230;.&#8221;, but more importantly it drops that folder to the bottom of your mail folders, getting it out of the way. The date at the end is a preemptive acceptance that you will probably lapse at least once in the future and will want to keep things straight when pull yourself together again.)<br />
<strong>Step 3:</strong> Create a maximum of 2 folders called &#8216;@ Project- XXXX&#8217;.</p>
<ul>
<li>Name the first project folder for the main thing you do. I&#8217;m talking seriously broad here. I manage the entire video business for MSNBC.com, leading our efforts in sales, editorial, technology, marketing; the whole lot. 90% of all email I receive relates to video in some form or fashion. I have a project folder called &#8220;@ Project- Video&#8221;. That&#8217;s it&#8211; ALL of the email relating to video that I need to save goes in there.</li>
<li>Name the second project folder &#8220;@ Project- Other&#8221;. This is where you will store everything work-related that didn&#8217;t fit into the first folder<em>. If your job is so varied that no one thing stands out, no matter how broad, <strong>ONLY MAKE ONE FOLDER.</strong><br />
</em></li>
<li>You may think, &#8220;How the hell am I going to find anything if everything I do is filed in one or two folders?&#8221;  I&#8217;ll get into a bit more detail later, but the bottom line is, you just will. You&#8217;ll probably remember who sent what you&#8217;re looking for, sort by name, and find it quickly. If you don&#8217;t, there&#8217;s always search. And there will always be search. You do not have to worry about some technologically apocalyptic future wherein you&#8217;re required to port all your mail to a VT100 terminal based <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_(e-mail_client)">Pine </a>system. Gmail (and mail search) will only get better&#8230;<em><strong><br />
</strong></em></li>
<li>The @ symbol (stolen from GTD) serves a different purpose here than it does there. It simply allows these folders to sort alphabetically to the top of your folder structure, making them easier to access. You&#8217;ll be using these fairly frequently.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Step 4: </strong>Create a folder called @ Follow-up. This is the most dangerous thing you will do, but you&#8217;re a grown-up and you must learn how to wield this power. This is where you will put all email that you can&#8217;t respond to today (for any reason) but need to at some point. Pay close attention later when I describe how to use it.</p>
<p><strong>Step 5: </strong>Create a folder called @ To Read, then filter like a madman. This is an ongoing process, but the gist is this: any email list, alias, or notification messages that do not directly cause you to do actual work should be filtered into this folder. Think of this like your email RSS feed&#8211; it&#8217;s there for stuff that you want to/need to read, but you are not required to act or respond. <strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Step 6:</strong>  This is optional, but if you have a mix of work and personal mail in one account (as I still do despite best efforts) create a folder called &#8220;Personal&#8221;. This is where you will file anything you want to refer to later that&#8217;s not work related&#8211; that link to the Youtube video with the cat shooting a machine gun, the sexy email from your boyfriend that you want to lord over him later, whatever.</p>
<p><strong>Laws of the Lazy Inbox:</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Delete ruthlessly- I mean seriously, pathologically Jeffery Dahmer ruthless. No fear, no doubt. You&#8217;ve got to learn to enjoy it, like popping bubble wrap or killing a determined mosquito. Email is a time-shifted communication medium. You are (probably) not gathering evidence for a lawsuit. You don&#8217;t record all your phone calls, do you? Why are you freaky about email? Don&#8217;t be. Let it go. Unless you have the memory of a brain-damaged goldfish, you&#8217;ll be able to recall the gist of what people said, want, etc. well enough that you don&#8217;t need to save their messages like they were the Chalice of Christ.</li>
<ul>
<li><em>Note: This is where the mobile device comes in for me most of the time. Any moment I have to spare I fire up mobile mail JUST to delete stuff I don&#8217;t need to read and/or save. Don&#8217;t respond, don&#8217;t think about acting, don&#8217;t worry&#8211; just clear things out for when you&#8217;re ready to get actual work done. This is also why an iPhone/Gmail sucks&#8211; deleting mail on the phone does NOT delete it from your inbox, defeating the whole point IMHO.</em></li>
</ul>
<li>If you just can&#8217;t delete it, can&#8217;t or aren&#8217;t expected to do anything about, but want to save it for future reference, file it in one of your @ Project folders (or Personal if it fits). The beauty of your filing system is that you could train the above-mentioned,  brain-damaged goldfish to file your damn email. No thought. Get it out of there.</li>
<li>If you actually have to do something, you have exactly 4 choices.</li>
<ul>
<li>Respond right now and delete (or file if you must). If will only take a minute or two to do it, this is always the best course of action. Answer the question, pass the buck, ask another question, whatever. Don&#8217;t read too much into or overthink the email. If your boss asks you to save the earth from environmental collapse, just try to take that first step in the process: forward the message to Al Gore and <em>get it the hell out of your inbox.<br />
</em></li>
<li>If you don&#8217;t have time to do the thing in the mail right now, grab the email and drag it into your calender. Block out a date and time to accomplish the thing inferred. In Outlook this is really simple&#8211; literally drag drag the mail from your inbox over to the calender button in the lower left. It&#8217;ll automatically create an appointment with the same subject and body as the email. Just pick an open time and hit save. Don&#8217;t overthink when to schedule yourself, or get all fancy trying to describe your task. Just pick some free time and move on. You&#8217;re lazy but you&#8217;re not a freakin&#8217; idiot. Be generous with the time&#8211; even if you think something will only take 15 minutes schedule yourself for 30. If you don&#8217;t need the time, maybe your bladder will.</li>
<li>If your action is required, but you have to wait for someone or something else before you can act, you&#8217;ve found the ONLY use of the @ Follow up folder. <em>As an example: Say your boss is asking for that TPS report. You&#8217;ve done your part, but you&#8217;re waiting on one of your underlings to finish his. Send your underling a reminder (or drag the mail over to your calender to remind yourself to walk over and beat your underling) then put your boss&#8217;s email in the @ Followup folder. </em><strong>Note: you should look at items in your @ Followup folder like inmates on death row in Texas. If they sit there for more than a few days, you better either schedule yourself to get the thing unstuck, or just freakin delete it and hope you don&#8217;t get fired. They will not solve themselves&#8211; this is the most vital thing to understand and the most dangerous part of the whole system.</strong></li>
<li>Last option: delete it anyway.<strong> </strong>This sounds insane, but you often just know you&#8217;re never going to get around to doing whatever is being requested of you. Emails from distant friends and relatives often fall into this category. You want to reply, but how often do you really? You have to be brutally honest with yourself. Either schedule some time to do it properly, or just kill it off. It sounds cold, but do you ever screen your caller ID? Hmmmm&#8230;. think about it.<strong><br />
</strong></li>
</ul>
</ol>
<p><strong>Further basking in the abject brilliance of the lazy email system<br />
</strong></p>
<ol>
<li>You&#8217;ll notice that there&#8217;s no task list in this system, only a calender. Lazy people should not be allowed to make their own decisions. They need to be told what to do and when to do it, in what order. You&#8217;re essentially tricking yourself into telling yourself what and when to do stuff. Neat, huh?</li>
<li>Given the importance of the calender, you must respect it. If you don&#8217;t get something done in the time allotted on your calender item, reschedule yourself until its done.</li>
<li>Calendar-dragging-fu works against your enemies even better than against yourself. If you ask someone for something and they give you the brush off (&#8221;get back to me next week&#8221;), just drag that email into your calender and set a time to get back to them when they said to. They&#8217;ll be so freaked out that you remembered that they&#8217;ll probably actually give you what you want.</li>
<li>If you&#8217;re, say, a consultant who manages 5 different clients at a time, the 1 or 2 folder filing system may sound like utter lunacy, but it&#8217;s key to the system and I strongly encourage you to give it a try. The less time you spend worrying about mechanically processing email, the more time you&#8217;ll have to be a badass consultant dude. Do more of what they&#8217;re really paying you for and let search do the heavy lifting of information retrieval. Let computers do their thing. They&#8217;re getting pretty good at it.</li>
<li>Taking notes: Just do it in email, then email them to yourself. At that point, you can process it just like anything else. If you need to clean them up and send them along to your team, just drag to the calender and schedule some time to do that. If you just need them for your own records, put them in your @ Project folder.</li>
<li>&#8216;Ubiquitous Capture&#8217; is all the rage in GTD circles (with their almost fetishistic Hipster PDAs and Moleskines) and for good reason. <em><strong>It&#8217;s critically important that you capture things for later follow up while you&#8217;re on the go.</strong></em> This is another great reason for the well-integrated, brick-sized QWERTY email phone. Again, just shoot yourself a quick, subject-only email to remind yourself, then process it when you&#8217;re back at your desk. If you have a little more time, go ahead and create a calender item right there on your phone. If you&#8217;re a dumb-phone kinda person, I suggest carrying a pad of sticky notes that you file in a personally annoying place (like stuck on the front of your dumb talk-only cell phone) to make sure you don&#8217;t forget or lose them.</li>
<li>Advanced lazyness: Now that I&#8217;ve gotten more comfortable with the system, I&#8217;m ok with leaving an email in my inbox for a few hours at a time, knowing I&#8217;m going to get to later in the day. But you can&#8217;t make a habit of it, and I strongly suggest not allowing even that for the first month or two.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudymind.com/2007/08/31/a-lazy-mans-successful-war-on-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading in reader</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/11/06/reading-in-reader/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/11/06/reading-in-reader/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew.locke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GTD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/11/06/reading-in-reader/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After being a Newsgator user for a couple of years, I&#8217;ve started using Google Reader for feed reading.  Even though Newsgator has great client apps for all of the platforms I use each day (OS X, Vista and Windows Mobile), I just got tired of having to pay for this, that and the other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After being a Newsgator user for a couple of years, I&#8217;ve started using Google Reader for feed reading.  Even though Newsgator has great client apps for all of the platforms I use each day (OS X, Vista and Windows Mobile), I just got tired of having to pay for this, that and the other thing. I am a cheap bastard.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been really impressed with the latest release of Reader (especially the keyboard shortcuts for navigation) and it&#8217;s nice not having to worry about syncing all of my various feed reader clients as I move from work, to mobile, to home. It does NOT get along with IE7, which is a real bummer since IE7 on my Vista tablet pc is REALLY slick otherwise.  The mobile site is good (in that there is one) but is really limited by it&#8217;s inability to &#8220;Mark all read&#8221;, and a pain to navigate with one hand on the Pocket PC phone.<br />
Another result of using GR is that I&#8217;m tagging items a lot less to del.icio.us, and a lot more using the built in &#8217;starring&#8217; mechanism. I stumbled around and found rssmix.com, which I&#8217;m using to combine my Google Reader starred items and my del.icio.us feed. Things I tag/star will now show up over on the right in the &#8220;Recently interesting&#8221; box.</p>
<p>If for some bizarre reason you have a burning desire to subscribe to that hybrid feed, the url is: http://www.rssmix.com/u/16743/rss.xml</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/11/06/reading-in-reader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go team</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/10/09/go-team/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/10/09/go-team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew.locke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/10/09/go-team/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSNBC.com wins General Excellence in Online Journalism (Large) and Outstanding Use of Multiple Media (Large) for Rising from Ruin.
I LOVE the fact that NOLA.com was honored too. I&#8217;m proud of what we did but their effort was freakin&#8217; heroic.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://msnbc.com">MSNBC.com</a> wins <strong>General Excellence in Online Journalism (Large)</strong> and <a href="http://risingfromruin.msnbc.com/stories.html"><strong>Outstanding Use of Multiple Media (Large) </strong>for Rising from Ruin.</a></p>
<p>I LOVE the fact that NOLA.com was honored too. I&#8217;m proud of what we did but their effort was freakin&#8217; heroic.<br />
<a href="http://risingfromruin.msnbc.com/stories.html"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/10/09/go-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fellow Mac users: MSNBC.com video now supports Mac, Firefox</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/09/27/fellow-mac-users-msnbccom-video-now-supports-mac-firefox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/09/27/fellow-mac-users-msnbccom-video-now-supports-mac-firefox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew.locke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/09/27/fellow-mac-users-msnbccom-video-now-supports-mac-firefox/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Yes, it&#8217;s true. MSN Video has finally released Beta support for Safari (Mac) and Firefox (Mac/PC) support on our MSNBC.com video player. I&#8217;m going to have to get Ubuntu back up and running on a spare machine to test, but it might even coincidentally work on Linux boxes with current versions of Firefox and Flash.
As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.com" title="MSNBC.com Homepage"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/108/254628503_03b41609a5.jpg?v=0" alt="MSNBC.com Safari video goodness" height="313" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s true. MSN Video has finally released Beta support for Safari (Mac) and Firefox (Mac/PC) support on our <a href="http://www.msnbc.com" title="MSNBC.com Homepage">MSNBC.com video</a> player. I&#8217;m going to have to get Ubuntu back up and running on a spare machine to test, but it might even coincidentally work on Linux boxes with current versions of Firefox and Flash.</p>
<p>As someone who works all day on a company-supplied 17&#8243; Macbook Pro running OS-X, and plays all night on my personal Mac Pro (also running OS-X 90% of the time), this is freaking great. It&#8217;s even better for my wife, a devout computer neophyte who knows only enough to know that she loves Macs and hates our site because video doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to go into the long, sordid tale of why it took so long, but I will say the MSN Video team really Sees the Light now. When I received my super-secret <a href="http://soapbox.msn.com">MSN Soapbox</a> invite, the first thing I did was fire it up in Safari. Low and behold, it works great. Huge kudos to those guys for taking the time to make sure their products are going to work for all of us going forward.<br />
We&#8217;re not ready to crow too loudly quite yet. This release is still in Beta, and may stay that way for a while. If you fire up the player and let it run for a while&#8211; about an hour in my very informal testing&#8211; Safari will bomb out, no doubt due to some nasty memory leak somewhere in the chain (my wildly uninformed guess- Flash plugin). Edge case, yes, but it&#8217;s a little annoying if you know it&#8217;s there. <em>Side note:</em> Intel Mac folks should really upgrade to the latest <a href="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash&amp;promoid=BIOW" title="Get Flash">Universal Binary version</a> of the Flash plugin. It&#8217;s far more stable than what came stock on our Macbook Pros.</p>
<p>Also, the Firefox/Safari player doesn&#8217;t support ads quite yet, which you&#8217;re probably thrilled about, but is an issue for us and our balance sheet. Finally, the video gallery at the bottom of the player seems to be a little slugish when the player first loads.  There may be other issues that we haven&#8217;t found yet but rest assured we&#8217;re going to make sure the dev team keeps pounding away on these issues.</p>
<p>More broadly, I can say with great confidence that the days of sub-par Mac support at MSNBC.com are coming to a great and final end. The question of Mac support comes up every time we evaluate new technologies, Microsoft-developed or not. There are loads of Macs now in use all across MSNBC.com, not just by our graphics folks but by Program Managers, a couple of Directors, even a VP.</p>
<p>Things aren&#8217;t perfect yet but we&#8217;re very, very serious about platform parity. Nothing better than eating your own dogfood&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/09/27/fellow-mac-users-msnbccom-video-now-supports-mac-firefox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>drowning in pictures&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/09/19/drowning-in-pictures-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/09/19/drowning-in-pictures-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 03:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew.locke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/09/19/drowning-in-pictures-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This is kind of a strange post, but I sometimes find spitting things out all organized-like helps me think&#8230;
I&#8217;ve been a professional photojournalist for many years (though I&#8217;ve been promoted beyond my personal point of incompetence and rarely shoot for work any more). I was lucky enough to begin my career shooting film and was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img width="500" height="333" src="http://static.flickr.com/80/247974527_cf6f5fa792.jpg" /></p>
<p>This is kind of a strange post, but I sometimes find spitting things out all organized-like helps me think&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a professional photojournalist for many years (though I&#8217;ve been promoted beyond my personal point of incompetence and rarely shoot for work any more). I was lucky enough to begin my career shooting film and was trained not only in 35mm but medium and large format. I&#8217;ve also experienced the birth of digital photography first hand: my first copy of Photshop was version 1.0 and came on a single floppy disk. I was lucky enough to experience the best of both worlds from the very beginning of my career.</p>
<p>All of our work now, of course, is digital. Even in my private work, I find very little reason to shoot 35mm film, though I do maintain a fondness for the extremely wide tonal latitude of B+W film.</p>
<p>Over the years, as digital has gotten better and better, I&#8217;ve sold off virtually all of my film equipment&#8211; EOS film bodies first, a few medium format cameras, my Leicas and both of my 4&#215;5 view cameras (a cheapish monorail and a fantastic Super Graphic). I still have a single EOS1n dedicated to shooting Illford XP2 film, but the digital Canon 5d&#8217;s I use now are absolutely without question the finest hand-held cameras I&#8217;ve ever used, period. Image quality is stunning, and the digital work flow is, at least for me, a dream. The quality, combined with the ease and speed of digital work flow, has pulled me away from film almost entirely.</p>
<p>About 6 months ago, we had our first child, a daughter. As any doting father, much less a recovering professional photographer, I&#8217;ve shot literally tens of thousands of images of her already, almost all digital. With digital cameras, I&#8217;m shooting with wild and liberating abandon. But I&#8217;ve started to grown less than completely satisfied, not just with the end product but the process itself.</p>
<p><span id="more-30"></span><br />
Everything she does for the first time (or last time) reminds me of how fleeting life is. Quickly made digital images, no matter how technically perfect, seem inadequate to capture not just her changing life but the world around me. The small, fast camera will always be a constant companion, but I want more&#8230; a process that pays respect to the gravity of capturing life as it passes by and disappears forever.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m arriving here: I&#8217;m ready to invest in an 8&#215;10 view camera and start working again not just in film, but in large format, black and white contact printing (i.e. where you take your 8&#215;10 negative and print it by placing it directly onto a sheet of 8&#215;10 paper, sans enlarger). This is basically the same process used 100 years ago, though I&#8217;m not quite ready for glass plate negatives yet. Even using modern film and chemistry, it is a basic, unforgiving, even crude way to make pictures.</p>
<p><!-- PProtector -->My goal isn&#8217;t necessarily to capture moments in excruciating, high-resolution detail, though that&#8217;s part of it. My mind&#8217;s eye is far closer to Sally Mann than Ansel Adams. I crave the unintentional errors I&#8217;m sure to suffer while wrestling with this fussy, slow equipment and laborious process. I can&#8217;t wait to start snapping up 100-year-old lenses on Ebay just to see what they&#8217;ll do.</p>
<p>It may be that I&#8217;m starting to become infected by nostalgia or romanticism, but I don&#8217;t think so. This feels like a thoroughly modern, if not completely rational impulse. I&#8217;m going to sit on it a little while longer, though, just to be sure&#8230;</p>
<p>But I do know I feel the need to start making images that are more like memories&#8211; absolutely perfect in some ways, soft and distorted in others. Somehow that just feels right to me, at least right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cloudymind.com/2006/09/19/drowning-in-pictures-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
